Essay about Bush and the Patriot Act Declaring War on...

Bush and the Patriot Act: Declaring War on Our Rights? When I decided to write this essay, I knew without hesitation that I would write about Washingtons response to the terrorist attacks that struck New York and Washington. I did not realize how difficult such an undertaking would be, as I find myself in a somewhat an uncomfortable position. Forcing myself to confront the issues at hand means deciding which freedoms are acceptable casualties in this war and for whom. To allow Attorney General Ashcroft to lead us into a new era of American justice that resembles McCarthyism or the internment of Japanese-Americans a half-century ago would be regrettable. I do not mean to imply that the US response should be weak; to†¦show more content†¦The world is now watching our actions closely. We are on the right side of justice in this war and should not give up our moral high ground in achieving our ends. Washingtons immediate, bipartisan response to the terrorist attacks speaks well for our representatives and reflects the revived sense of patriotism prevalent nationwide. However, we are now sufficiently distanced from the attacks of September 11 to hold the Administrations proceedings to the very American standard of justice, which we are now engaged in defending. I am shocked to witness this country quietly succumb to the recent blatant and inappropriate expansion of powers the Justice Department and White House have assumed. This is not melodrama. A democratically elected US President and his Attorney General are proceeding as if they were reading out of a rouge states instruction manual. This country is too great to fall to cave -dwelling terrorists who redirect a populations frustrations at us. It is not un-American to question the legitimacy of the recent anti-terrorism legislation, though risky for politicians who face being labeled liberal or soft in their response to the attacks. There is no question that we are justified in using tremendous force in retaliation. We do risk losing the worlds support and help though if we now abandon our judicial processes. The United States is undermining the fight against terrorism by allowing President Bush to assumeShow MoreRelatedShould Civil Liberties Be Restricted During Times of War1571 Words   |  7 PagesDuring Americas most consequential wars, the United States government has restricted civil liberties of the American people despite the nation’s strong rooted foundation for preserving every citizen’s rights. When danger is an ever present factor for the nation due to war or conflict restrictions are often placed on some of the most basic freed oms and liberties. Perfect balancing of these restrictions is vital to the countries wellbeing. One of the most well-known examples of this type of restraintRead MoreTerrorism : A Global Issue Essay1749 Words   |  7 PagesAngela Brown Professor Miller English 112 13 Sept 2015 Terrorism Many of us will embrace our loved ones before leaving our homes to start a hectic workday. As we hug our children and kiss our spouses goodbye, the thought of losing them, or our lives to acts of terrorism, is typically not one to cross our minds. On September 11, 2001, this mere thought became the reality for many families. The eleventh of September will forever be remembered as the date a terrorist organization, known as al-QaedaRead MoreEssay on Right to Privacy1929 Words   |  8 PagesAbsolute Power The right to privacy means controlling your own personal information and the ability to allow or deny access to others. As Americans, we feel its a right not a privilege to have privacy. IT technology and the events of September 11, 2001 are diminishing that right, whether its workplace privacy or personal privacy. From sending email, applying for a job, or even using the telephone, Americans right to privacy is in danger. Personal and professional information is being storedRead MoreThe Declaration Of The Patriot Act2055 Words   |  9 PagesUnite States the birth of Patriot Act as well as the controversy surrounding the Act as a whole, we will see that the patriot act went too far because certain provisions seem to violate the constitutional rights of the citizens of this country. First, I see terrorism as war and a terrorist in my view is a soldier going to war for certain purpose and reason to destroy. If captured, they should be treated as prisoners of war. What comes to the mind of terrorists is always war such as in military actionsRead MoreEssay on War on Terror2087 Words   |  9 Pagesdevastating act of belligerence on U.S territory since the Civil War (Terrorism, 2011). This even had an enormous influence on America and its history. It led to numerous short and long term effects. On September 20, 2001, former president George W. Bush announced publicly that he declares â€Å"War on Terror†. After this announcement, our country has altered. To determine if an effect was positive or negative, determines on the view point of the person. Some of those effects include; USA Patriot Act, creationRead More A Fascist America: How Close Are We? Essay2684 Words   |  11 Pagespolitical discourse and even made its way into the mainstream. When t he radical Weather Underground went into ultra-Left meltdown and began issuing incoherent quot;communiquà ©squot; to an indifferent American public, they invariably signed off by declaring: quot;Death to the fascist insect pig that preys on the life of the people!quot; Such rhetoric, too overheated for American tastes, was quite obviously an exaggeration: America in the 1960s was no more quot;fascisticquot; than miniskirts, HulaRead MoreEssay about John Edwards Biography1911 Words   |  8 PagesSenator Edwards worked tirelessly for a strong national defense, and strengthening the security of our homeland. He authored key pieces of legislation on Internet and port security, as well as biological terrorism. During the latter part of 2001 and throughout 2002, Edwards engaged in serious politicking, and on January 2, 2003, he announced the formation of a presidential exploratory committee, declaring himself a champion for regular folks. On September 16th 2003, in front of the old Milliken MillRead MoreThe Crucible Is Still Relevant Today1971 Words   |  8 Pageshysteria and destruction of the individual at the hand of society’s values reflected in the play perfectly encapsulated the atmosphere of 1950’s America. Miller’s thou ght provoking play was viewed then with much criticism, drawing the ire of the Right, due to its implied message of hypocrisy and subconsciously questioning what he viewed as malfeasance. But does Miller’s â€Å"The Crucible† still resonate today? I will argue that it does. In doing so, I feel it is imperative to try and understand theRead MoreHabeaus Corpas6626 Words   |  27 PagesThe War against Terror as War against the Constitution Jackson A. Niday, II Abstract: This essay examines rhetorical dynamics in the 2004 US Supreme Court case Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. News reports suggested the court split 8-1 or 6-3. However, case texts show substantive disagreements created a 4-2-2-1 split in the court. Moreover, while the justices on the bench split into four camps rather than two, those camps were not defined along ideological lines. This essay argues that pragmatism, the legalRead MoreDrug Trafficking And The United States10785 Words   |  44 Pagesresulted to a radical increase in the number of people who are affected by the illegal drugs. In the United States, the number has risen to about 19.9 billions. This paper will therefore discuss drug trafficking, its causes, effects, prevention and war against it. Whoever will read this paper, he or she will be able to take care of themselves from drug selling, consumption and production. The person will also be able to teach and help others on how to leave or protect themselves from drug abuse and

What must be done to protect New Zealand’s wildlife Free Essays

There is much said about protecting native species all around the world and New Zealand is no exception. In New Zealand we are facing challenges of our own when it comes to protecting and conserving our native species. This challenges range from oil spills to climate change to over-harvesting (in particular whale hunting). We will write a custom essay sample on What must be done to protect New Zealand’s wildlife or any similar topic only for you Order Now It is common reality that more needs to be done to protect our native New Zealand species. And this needs collective effort from each and every one of us to protect our native species-the government, NGOs and citizens. in my essay I will be emphasising on what we can do as individuals to contribute to protecting and conserving the native species and these includes reducing our carbon footprint, considering our lifestyle and lastly speaking out. I will then conclude by emphasising these points. Brief Background Due to its long geological isolation since breaking away from the supercontinent Gondwana about 80 million years ago, New Zealand’s plant and animal life has developed down a unique evolutionary path. Many of our native plants and animals are endemic – that is, found nowhere else in the world. The level of endemism among New Zealand plants and animals is one of the highest in the world. The tuatara, moa, kiwi, kokako, saddleback, huia, kakapo, native frogs and giant carnivorous land snails are just some of the species that are uniquely New Zealand. This isolation in the absence of mammalian predators for millions of years also meant that many of our native species were virtually defenceless against attack – for example, many of our native birds like the kiwi are flightless and nest on the ground. When humans – first Maori and then European settlers – arrived in New Zealand, introduced mammals came with them: rats, possums, stoats, ferrets, weasels, deer, pigs, mice, cats, dogs and others. These introduced species quickly took a heavy toll as they preyed and browsed on New Zealand’s largely defenceless native species, or competed with them. Human activities such as felling and burning vegetation and draining wetlands also destroyed much of the native species’ habitats. Native species such as the moa, huia, and the world’s largest-ever eagle, the Haast’s eagle, the South Island kokako and many others became extinct. Many more, such as the Takahe, the Kakapo and the long-tailed bat were radically reduced in number and remain perilously close to extinction today. Against this backdrop, the protection of our native species becomes ever more urgent. Thus this brings me to my emphasis on what we can do as individuals to protect our native species. Protection of our native species doesn’t only mean big campaigns by organization such as green peace o world wildlife fund. It also concerns us as individuals to contribute in our own small ways in protecting our native species. Unfortunately, we as individuals don’t realise these. Therefore, there are three things that I believe we can do to help in protecting our native species. They are reducing our carbon footprint, considering our lifestyles and last of all speaking out. Reduce our carbon footprint Each and every one of us can help save the planet from runaway climate change. Carbon emissions have been scientifically proven to be one of the main contributors to global warming. And as individuals, we think that releasing of carbon to the atmosphere is mainly done by factories of all sorts without realising that we also contribute to that. Therefore I believe that we have a responsibility to ensure that we minimise this. So this is how it can be done. Ever wondered how much difference your small actions really make? If every New Zealand household took these three simple actions, it could have a big impact. First of all, go car-free one day a week. Transport is a major contributor to New Zealand’s emissions (20%). If everyone in New Zealand who currently drives to work were to walk, cycle or take public transport on just one day per week, it would save up to 114,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year (Landcare Research’s carboNZero Programme Dec 2008). Secondly, we must switch our bulbs. If every household swapped their remaining old-style light bulbs for new energy efficient ones, this could save up to 0.6 billion kWh of electricity or 106,800 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year (Landcare Research’s carboNZero Programme in December 2008) Thirdly, we must turn un-needed appliances off at the wall. When not in use things like heated towels rails and appliances on standby account for almost 1 billion kWh of electricity per year or 165,700 tonnes of CO2 equivalent (Landcare Research’s carboNZero Programme in December 2008). If every household simply turned these off, we could make a big saving. So if all of the above actions are taken, it all adds up to us as individually contributing to reducing carbon emissions. According to Landcare research, the combined impact of these actions would be an emissions reduction of 386,500 tonnes CO2 equivalent per year. This is equivalent to over 839,000 car journeys from Kaitaia to Invercargill (Landcare Research’s carboNZero Programme in December 2008). Figures are based on work by Landcare Research’s carboNZero Programme in December 2008 commissioned by WWF-New Zealand. Consider our lifestyle Have we ever wondered how our lifestyles can contribute to carbon emissions which impact on the environment? In our pursuit of pleasure, enjoyment and expensive lifestyle we have become careless-careless in the sense that we are consuming things that we don’t really need. Carbon emissions are created by stuff – the more stuff you buy, use, consume and throw away the more you’re contributing to climate change. Did we ever known that? I guess no. Take a look at what we really need. Can we cut down on anything? By eating meat and animal products our carbon footprint will be higher than on a vege diet. Can we eat less meat? Garbage emits methane – a greenhouse gas – as it breaks down. Can we reduce our waste? Clothes, furniture, electrical goods – everything really – takes resources to produce and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions as it is moved around the planet. Can you buy less stuff and local stuff instead? Or above all consume only stuff that we really need. You can help – Speak out The last thing we can do is speak out. There are petitions made by organizations such as Greenpeace and World Wildlife Fund (WWF) to the government. The best we can do to help is to sign up. One such petition is the Forest Bird’s petition. You can help by signing Forest Bird’s petition to save sea lions. In this petition, WWF is calling on the New Zealand Government to immediately take the following action: 1. Determine the relative importance of the threats facing the sea lions. 2. Revise the Department of Conservations Sea Lion Species Management Plan. – (The revised plan should provide clear, time-bound actions to address the main threats identified in the comparative assessment.) 3. Develop an improved population model to guide sea lion mortality limits. – (The model should address the flaws in the current model and also consider the effect of food competition and epidemics.) 4. Set a precautionary mortality limit for sea lions in the squid fishery. – (This limit should be based on the improved population model and on a conservative assessment of the effectiveness of sea lion exclusion devices.) 5. Set an explicit sea lion mortality limit in the Campbell southern blue whiting fishing. 6. Set precautionary allocations of squid and other southern ocean fish stocks. – (These allocations should be ecologically based and explicitly considers direct and indirect effects of fishing on sea lions.) The numbers of sea lion pups are in freefall – estimates from the Department of Conservation show pup production has halved since 1998. So we can play our part by signing the petition. Conclusion To conclude, we must know that protecting native New Zealand species does not concern only the government or organizations such as WWF. It also concerns us as individuals to contribute in our own small ways. We need a collective effort to protect New Zealand’s native species. How to cite What must be done to protect New Zealand’s wildlife, Papers

In My Own Words Essay Example For Students

In My Own Words Essay Coming from a family with strong Democratic views and perspectives, has greatly impacted my political values. Growing up watching MSNBC with my parents, which is a liberal driven television network has me see I am a diehard liberal. with an ideology in which every citizen is inclined to his or hers natural rights. This Wednesday, August 28, 2013 marks the 50th Anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr. â€Å"March on Washington†, Dr King fought for equality and fairness for all. In fact my grandfather took part in the fight by joining Dr. King, and millions to fight for quality of life for all people. Dr. King march not for only Black people, but for all people who are being treated unfairly. This March on Washington symbolizes my family’s ideology. The March symbolizes equality for all, no matter what race, gender, or social economic status. Dr. King dream was that â€Å"his children will not be judge by the color their skin, but by the content of their character†. My family has instilled in me to treat people fairly and not to look at people any differently because of the wealth they obtain or education they hold. Dr. King â€Å"Dream† has not fully arrived, however we are getting closer. Today I can go to school with other kids of different races; fifty years ago we were fighting to have that right. Our finding father said that we ALL had the â€Å"Right to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness†, even though they did not abolish slavery, however people like Dr. King, and other civil right leaders have fought for equality for all and have somewhat succeeded. It is my belief that the Democrat Party is fighting for equality and the rights for all people, not just the ten percent. The Republican Party is full of contrast one minute they are saying government should stay out of the private lives of their citizens. They do not want to help people who are down on their luck; because they feel that the government should stay out of the lives of the private citizens. The Republicans believes that they need to get involved in private citizens lives. For example, our great country was debating the issue on same sex marriage for many years, the Republicans party was against same sex marriage until the Supreme Court overruled the. The Democrat Party is struggling to keep economic issues in the forefront focusing on economical struggles, rather than private matters. The Republicans are more interested in telling women that she doesn’t have the â€Å"right to choose†. The Republicans are against welfare programs, head start, but they are willing to tell a woman who wants abortions NO! This woman more than likely can’t afford a child. If the child is born, then they will let child go hungry, because the United States is not a socialist country. Checks and balances is what are needed to keep this country balance. There’s always the question about who should have power and how much. We elect presidents into office to lead us to better economic situation and to protect from all foreign affairs. Congress is there to monitor the president and to make sure he’s making the right decision that will better our country. I think our system of checks and balances is the best way to run a country. Sadly we have a congress that doesn’t want to see our president succeed in any way or fashion. President Obama can’t get bills passed because congress doesn’t to back him, and they do want him to be successful. .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c , .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c .postImageUrl , .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c , .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c:hover , .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c:visited , .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c:active { border:0!important; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c:active , .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ubed1f5ac939e5b04c4e2cba114f1790c:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Iliad EssayIt’s not that congress doesn’t agree with President Obama or not, quite frankly they just don’t want to see an African American president succeed. They rather see him crumble and fall instead of seeing their country rise above economical struggles. In order for this country to be run smoothly, Congress, the Senate, and the President must work together to overcome all of the issues that we are facing this nation. This is what Dr King vision was that we must all embraces are differences and work together to help people, other countries, and write policies that are fair to all.